Comments on: Bluetooth 4 Vs. Bluetooth 5: A feature comparison https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/ Making Technology Accessible Wed, 31 Aug 2022 13:47:43 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=6.7.2 By: Samuel Lavoie https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-31603 Fri, 09 Nov 2018 03:39:38 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-31603 Good and simple comparison table. I was looking for this to understand the differences of Bluetooth 4.2, 4.1 and 5! thanks :-)

]]> By: PureAbsolute https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-28521 Sun, 16 Sep 2018 02:15:43 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-28521 In reply to Andrius B..

Backward compatibility might mean the ability for current hardware to support the new standard, and not whether the protocol for v4.1 isn’t represented. So the new hardware is running 5.0, and the old hardware is running 4.1. But they both speak v4.1 to each other.

]]> By: BLE guy https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-19393 Fri, 13 Apr 2018 21:53:00 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-19393 Speeds here are completely wrong.

]]> By: Peder https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-19325 Wed, 04 Apr 2018 12:58:55 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-19325 In reply to Andrius B..

It must have it. Because I’m using an iPhone 8 and a v4.1 headset

]]> By: Andrius B. https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-19147 Mon, 19 Mar 2018 07:41:04 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-19147 You are wrong! Bluetooth 5 has backward compatability with previous versions.

]]> By: Suresh https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-18811 Tue, 06 Mar 2018 20:33:11 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-18811 Hi, Request you to check the bluetooth Spec and confirm the details mentioned. The bandwidth details are wrong

]]> By: hjk https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-18667 Mon, 26 Feb 2018 11:09:23 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-18667 In reply to Ilkka Loiamranta.

it says x2, not x2 more…

]]> By: Doesnt matter https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-18059 Tue, 30 Jan 2018 17:25:24 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-18059 In reply to Ilkka Loiamranta.

24×2 is 48
24×3 is 72

]]> By: Ilkka Loiamranta https://www.itechtics.com/bluetooth-4-vs-bluetooth-5-feature-comparison/#comment-16470 Thu, 02 Nov 2017 19:18:44 +0000 https://www.itechtics.com/?p=23263#comment-16470 Just a little comment on Your math. From 24 to 48 is double not two times more (that would be 72) From 100 m to 300 m is two time more or ‘3 times the last version). I am pissed on this because we have that kind of a phenomena in Finland. In a thecnical writing yhre math should be appreciated.
Thanks anyway, Your blog is otherwise in demand and the table tells it all in a nutshell. :-)

]]>